Court Exhibit·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.
Source document — Google Internal Email Thread Re: Hello and Follow Up (King/ABK Ad Credits Discussion) · In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google) · 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 886-4, filed 2023-12-21 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg's own words
King has made it clear to us that they believe the only way we can support them is by subsidizing their UAC spend with ad credits. King's initial request for ad credits was a pretty aggressive one and asked that we match 75% of their UAC spend with ad credits ($3 of ad credits for every $4 of their own UAC spend). King is currently spending about $40M annually on UAC with a goal of reaching full payback within 12mos.
King will like us to subsidize their UAC spend with ad credits so that they can significantly increase their spend budget and capture incremental revenues without compromising the ROI from their direct spend. In their model, they referenced how they can theoretically scale up their annual UAC spend up to $80M if we can help unlock $60M worth of ad credits.
Additionally, the ABK CEO met with Don Harrison at GDC last week and agitated over Play rev share. I think we need to move this along faster/in parallel with the overall Hug approval and be prepared to push this through as a one-off if we need to.
I'm a bit nervous about tying our credits to Play spend, in the event that leaks and we are accused of unfair treatment. It's been a safer concept for me for us to focus on campaigns/launches — i.e., if the partner does something big that we want to support, we co-invest.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google)
- Citation
- 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 886-4, filed 2023-12-21
- Date authored
- March 27, 2019
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.