Court Exhibit·27 AUG 2013
What You Won't Put In Writing Tells You Everything
If you can't publish the terms, don't pretend they're standard — say plainly that this deal is bespoke.
Source document — Google Play – Wall Street Journal Partnership MOU Email Thread · In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google) · 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 886-63, filed 2023-12-21 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Jamie Rosenberg & Purnima Kochikar's own words
Jamie Rosenberg (Aug 27, 2013): "I did read this and still have the same concerns vis-a-vis the contract."
Purnima Kochikar (Aug 22, 2013, forwarded): "I also like your approach of telling WSJ that we are doing something so special that we cannot put in writing; unfortunately, exec handshakes don't always help with day to day partner management. Documented lists do."
Jamie Rosenberg (Aug 22, 2013): "There are at least three things in here that I would definitely not want to be public and that wouldn't apply to every partner: 1. That we feel we need to 'pay' for G+ integration. 2. That we would agree not to promote competitive apps in the category during the promotion period. 3. That we feel we need to 'pay' for use of our billing system. We position this as an expectation, with exceptions. Rather than saying we can put this in writing because these are a set of terms we'd gladly publish and make available to any partner — which I don't think is true — I would rather tell WSJ that we *can't* put this in writing exactly because we are doing something for them that we would NOT make available to all partners."
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google)
- Citation
- 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 886-63, filed 2023-12-21
- Date authored
- August 27, 2013
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.