Court Exhibit·20 JUN 2018
When a partner complains, ask why before you respond
The loudest complaint is rarely about the thing being complained about.
Source document — In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google) — Exhibit 5973 · In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google) · 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 887-69, filed 2023-12-21 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Sarah Karam & Purnima Kochikar & Brandon Barras & Adrian Ong's own words
On POF, the user sees the same subscription options (we did a 1/3/6 product mix to setup an even test since I've heard that apparently Google will now not be supporting the 2/4/8 month mix which we find optimizes conversion for POF). We're seeing more users shift into 1M packages which results in lower LTV and this is further compounded by the fact that retention is significantly worse.
Retention I think is the real issue since the customer is having the same experience regardless of payment method. My hypothesis here is that GPB makes it much easier to cancel a subscription – which is positive from a customer experience perspective but clearly will have negative LTV impact across most, if not, all of our brands if this holds true across the board. Voluntary churn due to switching off renewal is significantly higher and renewal rates on credit card or iOS are anywhere from 100 to over 200% higher depending on the platform and product length.
In response, Google's Brandon Barras advised internally: 'My personal feeling is engaging Adrian point by point plays into what he is looking for and won't result in any positive results for the relationship.' Purnima Kochikar added that Match's escalating tone 'increased after FB announced their intent to go into dating,' and that the underlying goal of the complaints was 'to get better rev share terms.'
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google)
- Citation
- 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 887-69, filed 2023-12-21
- Date authored
- June 20, 2018
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.