Court Exhibit·4 JAN 2017
Your KPI Drives Behavior — Choose It Like a Strategy
The metric you pick isn't just how you measure success — it's the strategy itself.
Source document — United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) — Exhibit PX 17 · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1192-16, filed 2024-08-22 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Chip Hall & Chris LaSala & Gargi Sur & Max Loubser & Jonathan Bellack & Roberto Ruju & Barbara B. Piermont & Thomas Jacques & George Levitte's own words
I think we need to be very careful about setting revenue goals for EB, as this will directly drive the behaviour of the sales teams. Just give me a revenue target on EB and no other goal or rule, and I will 1. Work with, say, Rubicon to help them activate new publishers, and then 2. Go to buyers in the market and explicitly recommend that they buy that inventory through Rubicon rather than AdX. On the buy-side, the easiest way to grow EB is at the expense of AdX, and that's what I will be after.
Roberto Ruju later elaborated: revenue should not be the main KPI. Success of EB should be defined by metrics that include: Number of active publishers, Number of relevant exchanges participating, and Ratio of EB:HB impressions on DFP. A revenue forecast can then be the calculated outcome of these strategic metrics, rather than the principal driver.
Chris LaSala added: I'm ok with the $100m..but what goal can we have that sits alongside it and tracks our progress against the reason we are building this — namely to move pubs away from HB and into EB — can we track the decline in HB with other exchanges?
Chip Hall concluded: Revenue is an important metric for us this coming year since it will really be our first full year of operations for EB, but it is not our most critical success metric.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1192-16, filed 2024-08-22
- Date authored
- January 4, 2017
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.
Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg ·Google ·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.