Court Exhibit·1 FEB 2017
When Your Moat Shrinks, Know Exactly What You're Still Worth
A dominant market position isn't the same as a defensible price — and knowing the difference before your customer does is the whole game.
Source document — United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) — Exhibit PX 118 · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1195-5, filed 2024-08-22 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Jonathan Bellack & Aparna Pappu & Jim Giles & Chris LaSala & Josh Cohen & Max Loubser & Laurent Cordier & Justin Pang's own words
Jonathan Bellack (Director, Product Management, Publisher Ad Platforms) wrote on Jan 30, 2017: 'I think it's going to be hard to prove those values. How do we prove that other systems have a lot of malware and we don't, if we won't reveal all the details of how we do malware detection?'
Aparna Pappu responded: 'The value we add is DRS, RPO, EDA, Selective/Efficient callouts, Malware protection — in my mind this is HUGE and worth 15% itself — we need to do a FAR better job of calling out the impact of what we do here.'
Bellack also noted: 'If everyone else is at 20 we can justify 20. We never originally intended to have AdX as a premium over other exchanges, that was market price. Now that Index is at 10% and AppNexus is offering 5% at least as a promotion, the question is whether we can defend a 50% or 100% premium (15-20% vs 10%). I do not think it is feasible to try to defend a 3-4x premium (15-20% vs 5%) on third party AdX buyers.'
From IAB intelligence shared by Bellack: 'Hearst TV estimates that if he turned off AdX he would lose 30% of programmatic revenue, because every other SSP is second-string... Rumor that the DSPs are very serious about trying to get out of exchanges and work through header tags.'
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1195-5, filed 2024-08-22
- Date authored
- February 1, 2017
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.
Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg ·Google ·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.