Court Exhibit·26 DEC 2014
When Your Investor Becomes Your Biggest Competitor
The moment a board member starts leaving the room, the partnership is already over — the question is just who moves first.
Source document — Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. — Exhibit F · Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. · 3:17-cv-00939 (CAND), Doc. 811-6, filed 2017-07-06 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Ed Baker & Jessica E. Lessin's own words
Anyone who has been in Silicon Valley long enough knows all big tech companies eventually encroach upon each other's turf. And I think 2015 will be the year we see the early signs of a new tech battle for the ages: Uber vs. Google.
Both companies would have you believe they are more friend than foe. After all, Google senior vice president David Drummond is on Uber's board of directors. And Google Ventures has invested at least $250 million in the startup, making it one of the ride-sharing behemoth's largest investors.
But Google and Apple were once close partners too. So were Apple and Samsung, Google and Amazon, Intel and AMD and many others before them.
In this case, the battlefield will be real-time delivery of goods and services—specifically, bringing the on-demand and data-rich nature of the digital world into the physical world. At the highest level, both want to dominate the business of getting you a burrito or a babysitter or stocking your refrigerator as quickly as possible. It's about moving atoms as fluidly as bits.
Self-driving cars are another potential conflict zone. Does Google just want to make self-driving cars and use them to deploy its software and services? Or does it want to operate the network too?
I have no doubt that Mr. Drummond will one day start recusing himself from Uber board meetings just as Eric Schmidt did when Apple directors started discussing the iPhone years ago. The result will be a great battle—great for consumers and great to watch.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Citation
- 3:17-cv-00939 (CAND), Doc. 811-6, filed 2017-07-06
- Date authored
- December 26, 2014
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
More from Eric Schmidt
Eddy Cue ·Apple ·10 JAN 2013
Turn a Competitor's Weakness Into Your Positioning Strategy
When a rival's business model forces them to behave in ways users dislike, that tension is your product opportunity.
Joan Braddi & Sundar Pichai & Sergey Brin & Jonathan Rosenberg ·Google ·7 JUN 2007
Don't Pay for Customers You Already Own
If your partner brings no real users to the deal, they aren't a partner — they're a toll booth.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.
Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg ·Google ·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.