Court Exhibit·9 JAN 2020
Manage the Headlines Before You Send the Email
Internal words become external weapons — pick them like a reporter will read them, because eventually one will.
Source document — Epic / Google Play Privileged and Confidential Email Thread · In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google) · 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 888-49, filed 2023-12-21 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Dan Jackson & Colin Smith & Hiroshi Lockheimer's own words
Update: Epic appealed their most recent enforcement and submitted a new version of the app. However, the latest version still has not fixed the violation of our Payments Policy (i.e. it has not incorporated Play Billing) and they have shown no willingness to do so. As a result, we are sending them a notice this afternoon informing them we are rejecting their appeal. Our email also includes context about all past violations in order to dissuade them from making it public. We have reactive comms prepared if needed, but press largely have framed their reporting weeks ago as if we have already officially rejected the app, so this step is unlikely to result in a news cycle on its own.
Earlier in the thread, Hiroshi Lockheimer flagged: "BTW I know 'malicious behavior' is the technical term for it, but it sure helps make the headlines click-baity and also probably raises the blood pressure over at Epic. Can we try to soften the language in the future?"
Colin Smith responded: "Agree it's overly ominous sounding in this case and we avoid that phrase in our reactive statement. The comms to the developer details the specific policy violations and includes links to both the malicious behavior and payments policies."
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (Epic v. Google)
- Citation
- 3:21-md-02981 (CAND), Doc. 888-49, filed 2023-12-21
- Date authored
- January 9, 2020
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.