Court Exhibit·17 OCT 2016
Ideas Are Cheap; Buildable Plans Win Reviews
Senior leaders are paid not for the insight that points at action, but for the plan a hundred people can actually execute.
Source document — United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) — PTX1543: Email from Jonathan Bellack to Aparna Pappu (October 17, 2016) · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX1543 — DOJ public archive (page 1)
Excerpt · In Jonathan Bellack's own words
I do think your ideation is fantastic and valuable to Google. The deck shows you have definitely put a bunch of time into thinking Jedi++ through and laying out challenges & opportunities, and you have a strong vision for a positive end state. That said, I expected the supporting data, level of organization in the argument, and the depth of forward planning to be significantly further along six weeks after the strat summit and the big dinner with Eisar where Jedi++ was coined. I have found over the years however that new projects on the right track get the foundational thinking out well in advance, and are pretty well structured by the time they're in the last week of prep. I recognize that is a pretty high bar, but senior product leaders at Google are expected to go beyond the analysis / insights that suggest action, and craft the actionable plans that big teams can get on board with and have impact in the market. I would recommend really clearing your decks of everything external facing and non-essential internal between now and the review, and put the time into the core PM'ing work here — grinding out the data to back up the Jedi++ story, organizing and consolidating the ideas about what to do next into a few internally consistent, buildable options; co-planning with Jim about how this could actually get to market in 2017; and especially vetting this extensively with cross-functional teams so their views are taken into account.
Members · Archive
This edition is for members.
The daily letter is free. The archive — every prior edition, fully searchable — is for members. Sign in to start your free week.
$3/month · $30/year · cancel anytime
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX1543 — DOJ public archive
- Date authored
- October 17, 2016
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Dario Amodei & Emil Michael ·Anthropic ·26 FEB 2026
How to Walk Away Without Burning the Bridge
When the other side rewrites your redlines into meaningless words, name the trick precisely — then keep the door open.
Sam Altman & Elon Musk ·OpenAI ·18 FEB 2023
How to Handle a Powerful Critic You Still Need
When a former ally attacks you in public, don't defend — pivot to asking what they'd do instead.
Mark Zuckerberg & Elon Musk ·Meta, Tesla/X ·13 DEC 2024
Zuckerberg Tells Musk Meta Backed His OpenAI Lawsuit
A brief December 2024 exchange reveals that Meta quietly aligned itself with Musk's legal challenge to OpenAI's nonprofit conversion, and that Zuckerberg moved immediately to manage the relationship directly.