Court Exhibit·17 OCT 2016
Ideas Are Cheap; Buildable Plans Win Reviews
Senior leaders are paid not for the insight that points at action, but for the plan a hundred people can actually execute.
Source document — United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) — PTX1543: Email from Jonathan Bellack to Aparna Pappu (October 17, 2016) · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX1543 — DOJ public archive (page 1)
Excerpt · In Jonathan Bellack's own words
I do think your ideation is fantastic and valuable to Google. The deck shows you have definitely put a bunch of time into thinking Jedi++ through and laying out challenges & opportunities, and you have a strong vision for a positive end state. That said, I expected the supporting data, level of organization in the argument, and the depth of forward planning to be significantly further along six weeks after the strat summit and the big dinner with Eisar where Jedi++ was coined. I have found over the years however that new projects on the right track get the foundational thinking out well in advance, and are pretty well structured by the time they're in the last week of prep. I recognize that is a pretty high bar, but senior product leaders at Google are expected to go beyond the analysis / insights that suggest action, and craft the actionable plans that big teams can get on board with and have impact in the market. I would recommend really clearing your decks of everything external facing and non-essential internal between now and the review, and put the time into the core PM'ing work here — grinding out the data to back up the Jedi++ story, organizing and consolidating the ideas about what to do next into a few internally consistent, buildable options; co-planning with Jim about how this could actually get to market in 2017; and especially vetting this extensively with cross-functional teams so their views are taken into account.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX1543 — DOJ public archive
- Date authored
- October 17, 2016
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.