The Leadership Letter

Real correspondence from the people running real companies — and what it reveals about leadership.

How to Walk Away Without Burning the Bridge

When the other side rewrites your redlines into meaningless words, name the trick precisely — then keep the door open.

From: Dario Amodei, Anthropic — February 26, 2026:

"Emil, Thanks for your message. I appreciate your efforts. Unfortunately, our read of your proposed language is that it appears to completely remove our redlines; the autonomy provision is fully undercut by your addition of 'as appropriate', and the surveillance provision is fully undercut by 'and all other applicable laws'. This simply amounts to a blanket posture of 'anything lawful,' and the statement from the Pentagon's spokesman confirms that this is the intent. I unfortunately don't see a way forward given these categorical statements. We remain deeply committed to supporting the Department's mission and U.S. national security, as confirmed by our longstanding track record, and our ongoing and intensive work with the Department. I hope that you will reconsider the terms we have offered, but should the Department decide to offboard us, please know that we stand ready to do whatever we can to ensure full operational continuity for the Department and our troops who depend on our technology. Given the volume of leaks and media requests we are receiving, we will be issuing a public statement, but, as ever, hope it is still possible to reach agreement."

This edition is for members.

The daily letter is free. The archive — every prior edition, fully searchable — is for members. Sign in to start your free week.

Court Exhibit
Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War
3:26-cv-01996 (CAND) — trial exhibit, pp. 29-30 · public archive
February 26, 2026
Public domain
View the primary source →