Court Exhibit·13 AUG 2020
How to Pick a Fight You Planned to Win
When you deliberately break a powerful partner's rules, the letter you send isn't a negotiation — it's the opening statement of a lawsuit you've already prepared.
Source document — Epic Games v. Apple — Tim Sweeney Letter on Fortnite Payments (Exhibit G) · Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc. · 4:20-cv-05640 (CAND), Doc. 74-7, filed 2020-09-15
Excerpt · In Tim Sweeney's own words
I'm writing to tell you that Epic will no longer adhere to Apple's payment processing restrictions. Today, Epic is launching Epic direct payments in Fortnite on iOS, offering customers the choice of paying in-app through Epic direct payments or through Apple payments, and passing on the savings of Epic direct payments to customers in the form of lower prices. We choose to follow this path in the firm belief that history and law are on our side. Smartphones are essential computing devices that people use to live their lives and conduct their business. Apple's position that its manufacture of a device gives it free rein to control, restrict, and tax commerce by consumers and creative expression by developers is repugnant to the principles of a free society. Henceforth, all versions of Fortnite that Epic submits to the App Store will contain these two payment options, side by side, for customers to choose among. We hope that Apple will reflect on its platform restrictions and begin to make historic changes that bring to the world's billion iOS consumers the rights and freedoms enjoyed on the world's leading open computing platforms including Windows and macOS. If Apple chooses instead to take punitive action by blocking consumer access to Fortnite or forthcoming updates, then Epic will, regrettably, be in conflict with Apple on a multitude of fronts - creative, technical, business, and legal - for so long as it takes to bring about change, if necessary for many years.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
- Citation
- 4:20-cv-05640 (CAND), Doc. 74-7, filed 2020-09-15
- Date authored
- August 13, 2020
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
More from Phil Schiller
Eddy Cue ·Apple ·10 JAN 2013
Turn a Competitor's Weakness Into Your Positioning Strategy
When a rival's business model forces them to behave in ways users dislike, that tension is your product opportunity.
Matt Fischer ·Apple Inc. ·21 AUG 2018
When Your Pricing Faces Pushback, Negotiate Before You Lose the Deal
The moment your partners consistently refuse your terms, you have two choices: lose them or adapt — and waiting too long to decide is its own decision.
Tim Sweeney ·Epic Games ·30 JUN 2020
How to Frame a Demand as a Favor to Customers
When you can't beat a gatekeeper on their terms, reframe the fight as being about their customers, not you.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.
Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg ·Google ·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.