Court Exhibit·13 FEB 2009
Don't Compete on Price When You Own the Platform
When a rival slashes prices out of desperation, the answer isn't matching them — it's reminding your customers what game you're actually playing.
Source document — United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) — Exhibit PTX0039: Internal Email Thread on Atlas Pricing Competition · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1014-2, filed 2024-07-26 (page 1)
Excerpt · In Neal Mohan & David Rosenblatt & Marc Schraer & Sean Downey & Andrew Rutledge & Ruth Kirschner's own words
Neal Mohan to David Rosenblatt: "we have to build this into the display update and also make it really clear to patrick that the strategic battleground in display is publisher platform (ie, inventory). looking at dclk as a separate business and comparing cprd is silly. we should really get this through to patrick."
Marc Schraer (original trigger email): Atlas is offering HP a $0.015 CPM to stay with them for ad serving. Neeraj from GroupM "senses a new level of desperation by Atlas in their desire to win business." Two takeaways: "we'll need to eventually give GroupM or some other agency a response on $0.015 for HP and $0.015 looks to be the new game-changing rate we'll face for all big accounts."
Sean Downey flagged broader renewal pressure: OMD in negotiations at $0.045 baseline CPM; Havas asking for $0.025; WPP at $0.06 with a $0.04 flip incentive.
Ruth Kirschner: "while price compression is something we will have to fight this year, the HP deal is not going to be the reason for moving below our current .025cpm floor... HP is annoyingly telling each shop in the pitch that they need to meet a .015cent adserving rate... below our floor rates. if we can market global capabilities effectively we should be able to maintain price premium."
Members · Archive
This edition is for members.
The daily letter is free. The archive — every prior edition, fully searchable — is for members. Sign in to start your free week.
$3/month · $30/year · cancel anytime
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Doc. 1014-2, filed 2024-07-26
- Date authored
- February 13, 2009
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
More from Neal Mohan
Neal Mohan & Eric Rosenblum ·Google ·20 AUG 2010
Keep New Businesses Focused, Not Merged
When a young business is fighting to establish itself, the worst thing you can do is bury it inside a bigger org chart.
Neal Mohan & Eric Rosenblum ·Google ·20 AUG 2010
Keep New Businesses Focused, Not Merged
When a young business is fighting to establish itself, the worst thing you can do is bury it inside a bigger org chart.
Julie Sterling Osterling & Jonathan Bellack & Heidi O'brien & Chris Jansen & Brian Tomasette & Jason Sigalos ·Google ·29 SEP 2015
When Sales Can't Answer The Question, You Have A Strategy Problem
If your own sales team can't explain why you don't do the thing customers want, the market has already made the decision for you.
Mark Zuckerberg & Elon Musk ·Meta, Tesla/X ·13 DEC 2024
Zuckerberg Tells Musk Meta Backed His OpenAI Lawsuit
A brief December 2024 exchange reveals that Meta quietly aligned itself with Musk's legal challenge to OpenAI's nonprofit conversion, and that Zuckerberg moved immediately to manage the relationship directly.