Court Exhibit·17 MAR 2020
When to Pay Less and Still Keep the Shelf Space
Sometimes the smartest negotiation move is paying your partners less — if you can redirect that money to win the customers who matter most.
Source document — BC Deal Review: Agenda for Thursday, March 19 — US Carrier RSA Structure · United States v. Google LLC (Search) · 1:20-cv-03010 (DCD), Trial Ex. UPX0293 — DOJ public archive (page 1)
Excerpt · In Michael Murphy's own words
We have one topic scheduled for BC review Thursday: a proposed update to the Revenue Share Agreement (RSA) structure for carriers.
Asks for BC: Approve updated US carrier RSA structure that includes fewer configuration requirements (shift from full search integration to Default Home Screen, or DHS); reduced US carrier revenue share on new devices (no change to installed base); allows exception for Verizon only to allow Yahoo Home mobile app with Bing-powered Yahoo Search bar preloaded on +1 screen (not DHS); and delegation of authority to Platforms & Ecosystems Cross-Functional Deal Review (PEX) to determine how to utilize savings from reduced revenue share. Current plans include volume incentives for premium devices and longer term initiatives to drive Android share.
Rationale in support of deal: Incentive realignment appropriate given current trends whereby US carrier revenue share spend is growing YoY while Android is losing share. Savings from the new RSA structure can self-fund bounties in years 1-2 to drive targeted devices, and be redeployed in year 3+ to help grow the Android ecosystem. Search usage not expected to be materially impacted as long as Google retains placement on DHS. Relaxing configuration requirements to allow preloads of alternative Search apps helps ease regulatory risk and reinforces Google's principle to provide options to users. Carveout for Verizon allows partner to advance their current post-acquisition strategy for distribution of first-party applications across their user base.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Search)
- Citation
- 1:20-cv-03010 (DCD), Trial Ex. UPX0293 — DOJ public archive
- Date authored
- March 17, 2020
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Shanna Velez & Mike Marchak & Purnima Kochikar & Alyssa Ablao & Josh Kim & Randy Gelber ·Google ·15 DEC 2021
Discounts Are Cheaper Than Exceptions to Your Pricing Rule
When you can't grant a carveout, invent a program — same economics, but the rule stays intact.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.