Court Exhibit·23 MAR 2007
When a Rival Bids, Your Build Plan Becomes a Buy Decision
A build-it-yourself plan is only valid until a competitor's checkbook makes the timeline irrelevant.
Source document — Project Liberty — Board Update on Proposed DoubleClick Acquisition (March 23, 2007) · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX0015 — DOJ public archive (page 1)
Excerpt · In David Drummond's own words
Dear Board Members: I wanted to give you a heads-up about EMG's decision to enter the process to acquire DoubleClick, a leading online ad serving company owned by the private equity firms of Hellman & Friedman and JMI Equity (the transaction is codenamed Project Liberty). As some of you know, we have been interested in this company for some time, but have been pursuing a 'build-it-ourselves' strategy. Our interest became more acute after learning that Microsoft has already made a serious offer. The team believes that this is an important transaction for us, for both offensive and defensive reasons.
We have heard from reliable sources that Microsoft has made a bid in the $1.88 to $2.08 range. This weekend we plan to make a competitive bid by means of a non-binding term sheet/indication of interest.
Google's Rationale for Acquiring DoubleClick: Own DoubleClick's customer footprint to accelerate time to market for our own advertiser and publisher ad serving products. Acquisition of DoubleClick by Microsoft would make it very challenging for us to win customers for our own advertiser ad server, which would impair our opportunities in the brand ad market.
Microsoft's Potential Rationale for Acquiring DoubleClick: Access remnant inventory from DoubleClick's publisher ad server customer base to quickly scale its ad network. Use DoubleClick's advertiser ad server position to harm Yahoo!'s business, driving down its valuation ahead of a potential acquisition.
Members · Archive
This edition is for members.
The daily letter is free. The archive — every prior edition, fully searchable — is for members. Sign in to start your free week.
$3/month · $30/year · cancel anytime
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX0015 — DOJ public archive
- Date authored
- March 23, 2007
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
Mark Zuckerberg & Elon Musk ·Meta, Tesla/X ·13 DEC 2024
Zuckerberg Tells Musk Meta Backed His OpenAI Lawsuit
A brief December 2024 exchange reveals that Meta quietly aligned itself with Musk's legal challenge to OpenAI's nonprofit conversion, and that Zuckerberg moved immediately to manage the relationship directly.
Eddy Cue ·Apple ·10 JAN 2013
Turn a Competitor's Weakness Into Your Positioning Strategy
When a rival's business model forces them to behave in ways users dislike, that tension is your product opportunity.
Matt Fischer ·Apple Inc. ·21 AUG 2018
When Your Pricing Faces Pushback, Negotiate Before You Lose the Deal
The moment your partners consistently refuse your terms, you have two choices: lose them or adapt — and waiting too long to decide is its own decision.