Court Exhibit·25 JUN 2009
Control Who Builds On Your Platform Before You Open The Doors
Once you open a platform to everyone, you lose the right to choose who gets to compete with you on it — so pick your moment carefully.
Source document — Email from Neal Mohan to Jonathan Bellack et al. Re: PubMatic Ad Price Prediction (June 25, 2009) · United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech) · 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX0046 — DOJ public archive (page 1)
Excerpt · In Neal Mohan & Jonathan Bellack & Brad Bender & Ari Paparo's own words
We should discuss this offline. I'm not comfortable opening up the XFP APIs to the YMs at this point.
— Neal Mohan
Jonathan Bellack had written: We are not including the Yield Managers in the trusted tester program, but once we take the API public in Q3/Q4 when the GAM pubs upgrade, we won't be able to pick and choose who gets access. We will have a terms of service and can look at what non-compete constraints we might want, but I think we should be as inclusive as possible to drive platform stickiness. Plus there are not any APIs into the ad selection process due to latency concerns, so the yield managers won't be able to do dynamic allocation. They try a workaround like updating the CPM of network line items dynamically but our initial API quotas will likely put a limit on how up-to-date they could keep things. I also expect that over time we'll institute API charges for 3rd-parties like what AdWords does, so this is actually a good revenue opportunity too.
Neal Mohan had earlier noted: Of all the 3rd party developer categories, yield managers are the ones I am most nervous about in terms of access to our new XFP API. It's fine if they participate via the AdX seller APIs.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- United States v. Google LLC (Ad Tech)
- Citation
- 1:23-cv-00108 (VAED), Trial Ex. PTX0046 — DOJ public archive
- Date authored
- June 25, 2009
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
More from Neal Mohan
Scott Spencer & Nemo Semret & Eyal Manor & Craig DiNatali ·Google ·7 FEB 2011
When Your Product Has Gaps, Customers Tell You Exactly What to Build
A competitor winning your best customer is painful — but it's also the clearest product roadmap you'll ever get.
Neal Mohan & David Rosenblatt & Marc Schraer & Sean Downey & Andrew Rutledge & Ruth Kirschner ·Google ·13 FEB 2009
Don't Compete on Price When You Own the Platform
When a rival slashes prices out of desperation, the answer isn't matching them — it's reminding your customers what game you're actually playing.
Neal Mohan & Eric Rosenblum ·Google ·20 AUG 2010
Keep New Businesses Focused, Not Merged
When a young business is fighting to establish itself, the worst thing you can do is bury it inside a bigger org chart.
Don ·Google ·14 MAR 2023
Bundle Deals Across Divisions to Save a Weak Position
When one business unit can't justify the check alone, stack the strategic value across the whole company — or lose the partner entirely.
Karen Aviram Beatty & Lawrence Koh ·Google ·11 DEC 2019
Bundling Deals Can Backfire When Your Counterparty Wants Simplicity
When you stack asks to justify a payment, the other side sees complexity — and offers you a simpler exit.
Johan Heurlin & Lawrence Koh & Jamie Rosenberg ·Google ·27 MAR 2019
When a Big Partner Asks for a Discount, Reframe the Deal
The smartest concessions look like co-investment, not subsidies — same money, very different risk.