The Leadership Letter

Real correspondence from the people running real companies — and what it reveals about leadership.

Asking 'Why Not?' as a Growth Engine

The biggest businesses don't start with answers — they start with a stubborn refusal to accept the current customer experience as final.

2024 was a strong year for Amazon. Our total revenue grew 11% year-over-year from $575B to $638B. By segment, North America revenue increased 10% YoY from $353B to $387B, International revenue grew 9% YoY from $131B to $143B, and AWS revenue increased 19% YoY, from $91B to $108B. Just 10 years ago, AWS revenue was $4.6B; and in that same year, Amazon's total revenue was $89B. Amazon's operating income in 2024 improved 86% YoY, from $36.9B (an operating margin of 6.4%) to $68.6B (an operating margin of 10.8%).

Apart from the financial results, we made our customers' lives meaningfully better and easier. AWS launched new infrastructure and AI services including our latest custom AI silicon (Trainium2), a new set of frontier foundation models in Amazon Nova, and significant expansion of features in Amazon SageMaker and Amazon Bedrock.

Every year in my annual letter, I try to share insight into what makes Amazon tick. We've had a long-held philosophy about a simple question: "Why?" — "Why does this customer experience have to be this way?" "Why can't it be better?" Amazon is a Why company. We ask why, and why not, constantly. It helps us deconstruct problems, get to root causes, understand blockers, and unlock doors that might have previously seemed impenetrable. Starting in 1995, we asked why can't we offer customers every in-print book? Why not offer every book ever written in any language — all available within 60 seconds on a device that fits in the palm of your hand? Every one of these Whys has led to significant invention, and every one of them has made customers' lives better and easier.

1. Core Message

Jassy reports a strong 2024: revenue up 11% to $638B, AWS up 19% to $108B, and operating income nearly doubling to $68.6B. But the real point of the letter isn't the numbers. It's a philosophy: Amazon is a "Why company" that constantly questions why customer experiences have to be the way they are — and that habit, he argues, is what produces the inventions behind the financials.

2. What the Executive Is Really Thinking

Jassy is doing two things at once. First, he's reassuring shareholders that the core engine is healthy — margins expanded from 6.4% to 10.8%, and AWS is still growing fast off a large base. Second, he's defending the company's culture as the durable asset. The implicit message: AI is reshaping the industry (note the call-outs to Trainium2, Nova, SageMaker, Bedrock), and Amazon's edge won't be any single product but its method for finding new ones. He wants investors, employees, and recruits to believe the invention machine still works.

3. Key Management Lessons

Treat "Why?" as an operating tool, not a slogan

What it means

Jassy frames "Why?" and "Why not?" as something the company uses to "deconstruct problems, get to root causes, understand blockers." It's a working method, not a poster on the wall.

Why it matters

Most companies accept current customer experiences as fixed. The ones that don't end up creating new categories. The 1995 question — why can't we offer every in-print book? — became the seed of a $638B company.

MBA Perspective

This is Resource-Based View in practice. The competitive advantage isn't any single product but a hard-to-copy internal capability: a questioning culture applied at scale.

Real-world application

In product reviews, ban the phrase "that's just how it works." Force every constraint to be defended out loud. Half will turn out to be assumptions, not laws.

Anchor strategy in customer friction, not competitor moves

What it means

The "Why" is always pointed at the customer experience — "Why does this customer experience have to be this way?" Not at what rivals are doing.

Why it matters

Competitor-driven strategy converges. Customer-friction strategy diverges and opens new markets.

MBA Perspective

This is closer to Blue Ocean Strategy than Porter-style positioning. You're looking for unmet need, not a better seat at the existing table.

Real-world application

List your top 10 customer complaints or workarounds. Each one is a potential product. Most companies have this list and ignore it.

Compounding shows up over decades, not quarters

What it means

Jassy contrasts 2024 ($638B total, $108B AWS) with 10 years earlier ($89B total, $4.6B AWS). AWS grew roughly 23x in a decade.

Why it matters

It reframes the AWS bet. In 2014, $4.6B looked like a side business inside a retailer. The lesson: small, fast-growing units inside a big company deserve patient capital, not quarterly scrutiny.

MBA Perspective

Classic Disruptive Innovation pattern — a business that started serving an underserved segment (developers wanting cheap infrastructure) became the profit engine of the parent.

Real-world application

If you run a portfolio of bets, judge each one on growth rate and trajectory, not on its current share of revenue. Kill on slope, not on size.

Pair invention narrative with hard numbers

What it means

Jassy opens with crisp financials before going philosophical. Revenue, segment growth, operating margin expansion — then "Why."

Why it matters

Culture talk without proof reads as fluff. Numbers without story reads as commodity. He uses both so each makes the other credible.

MBA Perspective

Not a framework — a communication discipline. The financials earn him the right to talk about philosophy.

Real-world application

In investor or board updates, lead with the scoreboard. Then explain the why behind it. Skipping either half weakens the other.

4. Strategic Analysis (MBA Style)

Competitive Strategy

The stated strategy is invention driven by customer-experience questioning. The financial profile — AWS at 19% growth and operating margin nearly doubling company-wide — suggests Amazon is now extracting scale benefits while still investing in new platforms (AI silicon, foundation models).

Risk Analysis

The main risk Jassy seems to be addressing implicitly is complacency at scale. A $638B company can lose the questioning habit. By making "Why" the centerpiece of the letter, he is trying to keep the culture from settling into operator mode just as AI rewrites the stack.

Build vs Buy Analysis

The AI examples named — Trainium2, Nova, SageMaker, Bedrock — are all built, not bought. That's a deliberate posture: Amazon is choosing to own the silicon, the models, and the developer platform rather than rent them. Vertical integration in AI infrastructure.

Market Dynamics

Three segments, three different growth profiles: North America +10%, International +9%, AWS +19%. AWS is both the fastest grower and the strategic battleground, because cloud is where the AI competition with Microsoft and Google plays out. The letter's emphasis on AWS launches reflects where the next decade is being fought.

Long-Term Strategic Implications

If the "Why" culture genuinely survives at this scale, Amazon keeps spawning new business lines. If it doesn't — if the company drifts into defending existing lines — margin expansion will continue for a while but new growth engines will dry up. The letter is partly a cultural insurance policy against that outcome.

5. Hidden Insights

  • AI urgency without saying "urgency." The specific name-checks of Trainium2, Nova, SageMaker, and Bedrock signal that AI infrastructure is now treated as core, not experimental.
  • Vertical integration as a moat. Building custom silicon (Trainium2) plus foundation models (Nova) plus the platform layer (Bedrock, SageMaker) is a deliberate full-stack play. The letter doesn't argue for it — it just lists it as accomplished fact.
  • Margin story as a permission slip. Operating margin going from 6.4% to 10.8% gives Jassy room to keep spending on AI without shareholder pushback. The financial paragraph is doing strategic work.
  • Culture pitch aimed inward. The "Why company" framing reads as much like a memo to 1.5 million employees as a letter to shareholders — a reminder of the operating norm as the company gets larger and slower by default.
SEC EDGAR Filing
SEC EDGAR · EX-99.1
AMAZON COM INC · EX-99.1 · filed 2025-04-10 · Accession 0001104659-25-033450
April 10, 2025
Public domain
View the primary source →